Friday, June 2, 2023

Did Liberal Nonprofits Make Illegal Contributions to a Wisconsin School Board Race?


Share post:

Please share!

Multiple nonprofits may have made illegal campaign contributions to support “progressive” candidates

In the countless battles for control of local school boards, small organizations often get carried away with how far they can bend IRS campaign finance rules. That appears to be the case with a set of tax-exempt nonprofits in the small town of Kiel in eastern Wisconsin, which appear to have funneled money illegally to a committee supporting leftists in the town’s school board race last year.

In 2022, conservatives won control of the school board after teachers unions began pushing Critical Race Theory and other far-left topics on schoolchildren. Their reforms prompted “progressives” to push back hard.

In May, the school district filed a Title IX complaint accusing three middle school boys of “sexual harassment” for using incorrect gender pronouns on a fellow student. The school board, with help from the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, got the lawsuit dropped.

Activists turned to boycotting local businesses owned by conservative school board members with help of left-wing media outlets, which harried the board members as “far-right” for attempting to remove the district’s leftist superintendent. Two of the conservative board members ultimately resigned in February 2023.

Three seats are up for election on April 4th. A state committee—Best for Kids in the KASD (Kiel Area School District)—run by a local resident, Shane Konen, is pushing residents to vote for the left-wing candidates Dan Meyer, Tony Johannes, and Jim Bajczyk. But there’s reason to believe the group is funded by illegal campaign contributions.

Questionable Expenditures

The IRS prohibits 501(c)(3) public charities from directly intervening in elections. That includes independent expenditures, funds used to advocate for or against a candidate without his authorization, and direct contributions to committees.

The idea is to restrict campaign work to political action committees (PACs)—both federal and state—and 501(c)(4) groups, a type of nonprofit allowed to engage in limited electioneering, since donors’ contributions to (c)(3)s are tax-deductible.

In March 2022, three Kiel-based 501(c)(3) nonprofits made financial transactions with Best for Kids in the KASD. We’ve traced $400 from Friends of Kiel Performing Arts, $400 from the Kiel Booster Club, and $2,000 from the Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools (through its project Wisconsin Public Education Network).

Source: Wisconsin Campaign Finance Information System

Best for Kids reported that it had made independent expenditures ahead of the April 2023 election in support of Johannes, Meyer, and Bajczyk. It appears likely that these expenditures were made using 501(c)(3) funds, which, if true, would be illegal and could result in revocation of tax exemption and a hefty IRS fine.

Were these grants illegal? The IRS’ clear prohibition on (c)(3)-PAC contributions suggests they are, but we won’t know until someone takes them to court.

This was originally published at Restoration of America'
Hayden Ludwig
Hayden Ludwig is director of policy research for Restoration of America and an expert on the Left’s ‘dark money’ networks.

Related articles

Let the Hyperbole Fly and the Kool-Aid flow as the Real GOP Primary Battle Begins

Spirited primary battles are normal, and some years are worse than others. Anyone who complains simply does not understand good old-fashioned American political history. Quite simply, it comes with the territory; especially when Trump is involved.

“The system was never designed for their kids.”

Graduation season is currently upon us, and it is amazing to look online and see people in different...

Senator Tammy Baldwin is Vulnerable if She Actually Runs in 2024

Recently, I wrote about Sarah Godlewski being much more visible since Governor Tony Evers appointed her to assume the Wisconsin Secretary of State role after Doug LaFollette ‘suddenly’ resigned. I discussed the possibility that she was preparing to run for Senator Tammy Baldwin’s Senate seat in 2024. Since then, Baldwin has declared that she is indeed running for re-election. While I still do not buy it, let’s assume she is running. This time around, she will be more much vulnerable than ever before.

The Political Intolerance of the Religious Zealot

We have just come out of one of the hardest-fought election battles ever to take place here in...